Selected Laws

Posts Tagged ‘United’

“All these attacks prove that settlers are dangerous and that it’s impossible to live with them. If these settlers are allowed to stay, that would mean more friction and confrontation. Peace can be achieved only if Israel withdraws to the last centimetre of the Palestinian territories occupied in 1967” – Ahmed Qurei , Head of Palestinian Authority Negotiating Team – Jerusalem Post – 13 December 2008

This call to remove every Jew living in the West Bank – 500000 men, women and children – was accepted in total silence by the United Nations. No urgent meeting of the General Assembly or any of its Human Rights Committees was called to condemn this racial vilification of Jews by a former Prime Minister of the Palestinian Authority and its chief negotiator with Israel.

One remembers how fervently world leaders correctly argued that you couldn’t blame all Moslems for the terrorist actions of those few who hijack Islam and commit horrible atrocities worldwide in the name of Allah.

No similar statements were heard from those same leaders this week condemning Mr Queri for calling for the removal of those 500000 Jews because of the misguided actions of a few.

Collective punishment – not to be tolerated for Gazan Arabs – was perfectly acceptable when it involved West Bank Jews.

Indeed the UN Security Council met just three days after Mr. Qurei’s outrageous statement –yet raised not one word of protest or censure at his highly offensive and hate-ridden remarks.

Instead it passed Resolution 1850 (2008) by 14 votes to 0 – with Libya abstaining – declaring “its support for the negotiations initiated at Annapolis on 27 November 2007 and its commitment to the irreversibility of the bilateral negotiations“ and called “on both parties to fulfil their obligations under the Performance-Based Roadmap, as stated in their Annapolis Joint Understanding and refrain from any steps that could undermine confidence or prejudice the outcome of negotiations.”

One could not imagine a more destructive statement designed to undermine confidence or to prejudice the outcome of the Annapolis negotiations than that delivered by Mr. Qurei.

His demand defiantly flies in the face of the written commitment given by President Bush to Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on 14 April 2004 – forming an integral part of the Roadmap negotiating process under the auspices of the Quartet – America, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations.

In that letter President Bush stated:

“As part of a final peace settlement, Israel must have secure and recognized borders, which should emerge from negotiations between the parties in accordance with UNSC Resolutions 242 and 338. In light of new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli populations centers, it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949, and all previous efforts to negotiate a two-state solution have reached the same conclusion. It is realistic to expect that any final status agreement will only be achieved on the basis of mutually agreed changes that reflect these realities. “

In declaring its support for the Annapolis negotiations the Security Council conveniently ignored the basis on which those negotiations were undertaken by Israel as expressed in these clear and unambiguous terms by its Prime Minister – Ehud Olmert – at the opening of the Annapolis conference:

“The negotiations will be based on previous agreements between us, U.N. Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, the road map and the April 14, 2004 letter of President Bush to the Prime Minister of Israel.”

All the international players sitting in the Security Council – including outgoing US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice – were surely aware that Mr Qurei’s statement sounded the death knell for the Annapolis negotiations and signalled the end of any hope for a successful outcome of those negotiations.

Yet instead of condemning Mr Qurei’s statement – or demanding its retraction – Ms. Rice had the effrontery to tell the Security Council that Israeli and Palestinian negotiators:

“had made the choice to defeat an ideology of hatred with one of hope”

The only conclusion that one can draw from the Security Council’s extraordinary conduct in totally ignoring Mr Qurei’s statement is its unwillingness to face up to the fact that Annapolis is finished, President Bush’s dream has turned into a nightmare and the Quartet’s strategy in backing President Bush’s Roadmap has exposed it as totally impotent in having any influence to determine the allocation of sovereignty in the West Bank between Jews and Arabs.

The Security Council by its silence has offered encouragement to those Jew haters like Mr Qurei who for the last 130 years have opposed Jews having any right to live in their biblical homeland – the West Bank – or indeed within any part of the 23% of Palestine designated by the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine and article 80 of the United Nations Charter as the site for the reconstitution of the Jewish National Home.

In doing nothing to disavow the Arabs from pursuing their long standing enmity and racial hatred of the Jews, the Security Council has ignored a whole body of international law on the issue and given comfort to the long held Arab view that everything done since the creation of the Mandate in 1920 is deemed null and void.

“Jews out” is indeed a call that is still alive and kicking in the Middle East.

This racist fantasyland has been given a considerable boost by the Security Council’s flirtation with – and failure to unequivocally repudiate – Mr Qurei’s remarks when endorsing Resolution 1850. United Nations efforts to eliminate all forms of racism worldwide have been seriously compromised.

RIP President Bush’s Performance –Based Roadmap. RIP Annapolis. RIP the United Nations.

More National Security Articles

We

the posterity of our ancestors, before the government came to the United States, these and all mankind, so that should clarify our complaints arising out of a long series of abuses of our inalienable rights and flagrant violations of the Federal Constitution are these United States, signed, ratified and which was tied the whole, what with our limited federal government and its structure. No one wants to right the darkest scenarios in which only formed a government by the consent of the people and limited by the chains of the written words reflect not so boldly declares for all to witness chooses to follow, the consent or words from unjust reasons, said and unholy during forced spurred by the fantasies of some of the population to abandon those limits. Beware of the date on which such an instance is true, warn any sane person would! But what if such a time is indeed upon us? If the sane man who warns us not to say it? For the answer can not guard the grounds that nothing more than a hearty and powerful, “No!” to be on the land of the highest peak, so it may be heard shouting from all the valleys, and echo. Sane men wanted their liberty would never stop being a step behind its target and would never to such an outcome would certainly admit, and never silenced when their freedoms are taken and the foundations of the government are limited violated. It is not a motivation beyond being simple and enthusiasm for our God given freedoms wish that this statement comes at this time. It is only here by the need deep in the hearts of all freedom-loving women and men. This is what drives this proclamation to the top of the mind of all mankind.

Through the long course of human events that have transpired since the end of the convention that formed this nation in a representative republic and unified us as a loose federalist society of independent and sovereign states and the citizens Continental Congress brought us together in unity against oppression, it has become necessary and proper, the leaders committed to our general welfare for the redress of complaints by citizens of the United States of such persons petition. Such a request is just and fair and lawful process, must be put to use by all citizens of the United States objected to such actions and events have transpired to make such things clear for all to see.

This must be done! should not need to be forthcoming for remedial and other actions, in good conscience, be taken by men to regain their rightful freedom of the foundation must be firm place, so that only those who lose desire, not their power and the repression of the current could continue day object.

free and just takes us all to declare that our complaints are against this Republic as follows. The width: The Congress for many years allowed by a series of presidents and the courts and the judges they have appointed and by the previously mentioned elected officers of this nation so much the general and limited in terms of exceeding various articles of our constitution. In such, they have far too much that was never presented under the auspices of promoting the general welfare and the production is neither necessary nor proper for government to meet their specific and defined obligations. The

more directly: The federal government has a form of taxation on citizenship, which carries a larger share of the burden to finance the current government from those who it considers arbitrary to earn too much and accomplishing little or nothing from those who deserve it keeps initiated too little, rather than a fair system of taxation, that all citizens, ultimately the desire for knowledge about the actions of their elected representatives and jealous how every penny is their money is spent and which requires that all makes, to bear the burden of the cost of government. has

the Federal Government on this system of taxation is based, was a further system of redistribution from the former to the later and thus has a slave part of the American people in a way forbidden by the ratification of the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution and has always been an abomination of justice and the laws of God’s nature.

The federal government has done this intentionally confusing and complicated system of taxation striking out to create within the population a sense of fear that the Federal Government has this massive system of laws used to get citizens to to harass law-abiding people criminals who seek to do for their countrymen and ultimately lead them arbitrarily as a weapon against our liberties, to compel our actions.

The Federal Government has its mandate under Article I of the Constitution by the introduction of compulsory contributions by taxing the Americans working for the retirement and pensions paid by himself and other Americans so they forced to pay excess purchase of goods or service that you may not wish to pay the penalty and before picking up the bag on the way of the other.

The federal government has exceeded pay their mandate under Article I of the Constitution by the introduction of compulsory contributions by taxing the working Americans to the health care cost of other Americans. It has further sanctions for persons who do not want to purchase health insurance and are thus forced to give the American public, contracts against their will or face fines in blatant violation of our liberties taken.

The Federal Government has its mandate under Article I of the Constitution, by contributions from the Americans working for the food of other Americans pay exceeded.

The Federal Government has its mandate under Article I of the Constitution, by contributions from the Americans working for the accommodation and physical well-being of other Americans pay exceeded.

The federal government has the First Amendment’s prohibition laws against freedom of speech, the adoption of laws that dictate directly into the way people can present their ideas and beliefs that are still around in the time of an election than just communicating a stark example and injured by harassing churches and their leaders, who spoke on the politics from the pulpit and against the policies of the rulers, but how dare another.

The Federal Government has the second amendment to the spirit and clear formulation by the law abiding people of this nation’s laws violated, as the preservation and storage of weapons other than those arms of government acceptable and at times and places, rather than approved of the ban at all times.

Congress has abdicated its responsibilities entrusted to the Constitution alone, that body to make it right, and places this authority in many cases to non-elected bodies, departments and offices, as an attempt to skirt the constitutional prohibitions and limits created their own power.

The federal government has resources that belong to the right of independent countries and people of this nation put off limits by the use of superfluous words such as national parks and in traffic are nowhere stated in the framework of its powers clearly found. The use and abuse of eminent domain also has a huge problem that has been left, with members of the Supreme Court wonderful affirmation of the ability of governments to make large and small area to injustice from the current owner of the property to the country to grant Foster became a new owner in the interests of enhancing tax revenue or the production of other services, said governments.

The federal government has to try and continue, the United States that are Parties to contracts that directly overwrite and change the constitution, without giving the prescription for such a process under Article V of the document.

The Federal Government has conveyed its will in the right of all citizens to freely contract with one another by imposing regulations such as those relating to wages, which must be from one to another but are paid an example and try to interfere with the legally binding terms of claims, including mortgages and other loans more than just one.

The federal government has unconstitutionally acquired in the game, many companies, including banks, other financial institutions and automakers through its constitutional powers.

The Federal Government has power to regulate abuses the value of the currency and has developed a system to manipulate the banks and the control of the economy, as the government believes, as on the disclosure of personal freedom of citizens should be controlled.

The federal government has not adequately carried out its functions under Article I of the Constitution to regulate immigration to the United States. Although it is sometimes useful laws passed under such authority has failed time again with them in a satisfactory way to enforce and by correlation, it has failed to defend the United States prior to the invasion by those who do not by such laws, and would that leaving the Federal Government to the citizens of this nation vulnerable to attack, battery, theft and harassment by illegal foreign agent.

presidents have appointed the judiciary, and Congress has approved these appointments, on several levels a countless number of judges who have acted on their constitutional powers, and created laws ignored or even the Constitution, without any of to act from their posts in the poor behavior and ugly no denying such a post in the first place because of obvious hostility to our liberties and the clear wording of the Constitution.

Congress has failed to remove constitutional provisions by members of the body, serious crimes, but not limited to including tax fraud, bribery and accepting bribes and perjury, and who have agreed to have is in violation of public trust. Instead, such members are often allowed to stay in office and wield great power over the American people, if their guilt is not in doubt in these matters.

The Congress has many other and various rights by the people and the States and done so through the law blatantly denied the tenth amendment, including the failure to observe broken, but not limited to, the creation of the Swiss Federal . Department of Education, can have a federal Environmental Protection Agency Foundation, a Federal Communications Commission and Federal Department of Health, which all try to be unconstitutional power over the people.

this long and comprehensive list of failures by our government now prominently situated down before the people as a whole, it is declared proudly that we redress, and we must all be made by the correction of these and other flagrant injustice, and a complete list that would take far too long to enumerate them. Justice of Almighty God commands that we, as free men and women is a privilege for our inalienable rights without interference from the governments of this earth, and that only governments have to act just as they are instructed and within the limits of respect for the inalienable rights of all. For years, we have informally referred to our elected representatives to the federal law that mistake. At the same time people tried to use the established courts to have to do the same. While, however, were obtained from time to small victories in those venues time to mount further abuses and to revise our representatives on and go to recast the provisions as too broad and return with another outrageous attempt to our liberties violated time and again this demand and The petition for redress of crucial importance.

We ask that does not support this plea, on deaf ears. For the story calls us to recognize as sovereign souls wanted the freedom and pushed to the extreme limit of a burgeoning tyranny said liberties should choose to respond. The story also shows how this would be within the tyranny and the commander of his MAW respond to such actions transpiring in this process much further and give pain and prevent suffering among the people to assert their authority. We will not respond to the actions of the past, because they are disgusting and needed by all rational souls repeated. But the outcome should be known by those who designed this petition properly, that will free people to fight more fervently to remain free and offer much in the pursuit. Let us all know, do not go this way a red dyed with the blood of patriots and tyrants who have both taken on him in battle. Let us all live as free men and women under certain strict and restrained government. And let us redress for these problems quickly. By the grace of Almighty God on this day, March twenty-sixth, two thousand and ten in the year of our Lord proud and bold I attach my name and my ancestors as I pledge my life, my happiness and my sacred honor to see that the conditions of this appeal! be done

Laus Deo certificate – JJ Jackson