Selected Laws

Posts Tagged ‘Defense’

If you ever get cited or have a Florida Dwi Arrest, there is a Florida Dwi Defense. Once you get charge for a druving while intoxicated in these state, you should take it seriously. The charge is a serious matter and should never be taken lightly. A Florida Dwi arrest has a lot of implications on your life as well as your livelihood. It can also affect your employment, your life, your personal freedom and of course your future. So getting a Florida Dwi Defense lawyer is a must.

Since the consequence of your state dui arrest is tantamount to a disaster. You need a quality or excellent lawyer or attorney to defend your rights and thereby protected. A quality attorney or lawyer should have a good understanding of Florida Dwi Laws and court proceedings. Hiring a quality Florida Dwi Defense lawyer can a difference in the outcome of your case.

Time is very critical if you have a Florida Dwi Arrest. With your drunk driving in these state, you could lose your license in as few as 7 days if you do not act immediately. A good or excellent lawyer could keep your drivers license and fight those costly fines and penalties. The lawyer could even help you avoid jail time as well. But this depends on a case to case basis. With the ever increasing fines, penalties, and jail times for drunk driving or driving while intoxicated, there is no doubt you need a good lawyer.

Once you hear the word attorney or lawyer, you get intimidated. But do not get intimidated with it. I know the first thing that comes to your mind is the cost. Not all good and excellent lawyers are only for the rich and famous. There are a lot of good affordable dwi or dui lawyers. Obtaining a Florida Dwi Defense legal expert to represent you in court is more affordable than you might think. In fact some if not a lot them do give some free consultations. They even give or offer flexible payment options if you cannot pay once in full.

Most of these law firms can be found online which is easier to contact or get in touch with. You may also find it more convenient since you have a lot of options of scouring the web to find which you may think may best suit your needs. What you need to look for is someone who is well verse and familiar with Florida laws and court proceedings. You may also check for their history and cases they have defended successfully. Also the rate of success defending their clients should also be check.

Just be beware of scammers who pretend to be good but actually lemon lawyers. Avoid them at all cost. Good lawyers do not give too fancy advertisement about their expertise. Their history proves who they really are. Always find the law firms that have extensive expertise on Florida laws and court proceedings.

Take your Florida Dui arrest seriously and obtain the best possible defender for your Florida Dwi Defense. It could make a difference on your life and future. Get smart and serious about and do not delay.

Find More Florida Law Articles

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MAJID KHOURY,
Superior Court of California, Los Angeles
June 5, 1980

Defendant then walked back through the checkstand and into the store, leaving the box with the cashier.  Defendant was arrested by store security after the box was opened, disclosing in excess of $ 900 worth of store items, consisting of batteries, tools, and chain saws, but no chandelier.  The Municipal Court for the Citrus Judicial District of Los Angeles County (California) convicted, entered upon a jury verdict, for grand theft.

Issues:

Whether there was an insufficient evidence to convict the defendant for grand theft?
Whether the evidence was insufficient to show an asportation or carrying away of the personal property of the Fed Mart Store?

The Court states that the crime of larceny is the stealing or taking of the property of another. ( Pen. Code, § 484.)  The completed crime of larceny as distinguished from an attempt — requires asportation or carrying away, in addition to the taking.  The element of asportation is not satisfied unless it is shown that ‘the goods were severed from the possession or custody of the owner, and in the possession of the thief, though it be but for a moment.  The other element of theft by larceny is the specific intent in the mind of the perpetrator to deprive the owner permanently of his property.  The sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding of intent is not a claim of error on this appeal but is important in reviewing the jury’s determination of the existence of the element of asportation or carrying away, a question of fact.

The Court observed that the jury was instructed that “In order to constitute a carrying away, the property need not be actually removed from the premises of the owner.” Any removal of the property from the place where it was kept or placed by the owner, done with the specific intent to deprive the owner permanently of his property, whereby the perpetrator obtains possession and control of the property for any period of time, is sufficient to constitute the element of carrying away.

The Court held that “In this case the jury was properly instructed as to the necessary elements of the crime of theft by larceny. They were not told that there could be no taking or carrying away or asportation unless defendant was able to get the chandelier box containing other store property past the cashier. This was a factor to be considered by the jury, as the trier of fact, in determining whether there was or was not an asportation.  The intent to permanently deprive the store of its merchandise was clear. The defendant in this appeal does not even attempt to negate the element of intent by proof of innocence though careless mistake.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

More California Law Articles